Last week I had the opportunity to moderate a great conversation with Brian Weisberg from Mux and Danny Prohaska from EPM Solutions on how the finance technology stack is evolving.
We covered everything from our old friend Excel to today's AI-native platforms, what has actually changed, what's still missing, and where finance teams are headed next.
It was a thoughtful discussion with strong perspectives from both the customer and implementation side.
If you missed it live, you can watch the recording here (scroll to the bottom and you'll see the link!)
Jersey Mikes IPO: S1 Breakdown
How to sell $4B in sandwiches and own almost none of the stores.

Peter Cancro was 17 when he borrowed money from his high school football coach and bought the local sub shop he worked at. The shop was called Mike's.
Peter’s name is not Mike. But Peter is very rich. Because fifty years later he sold most of the company to Blackstone in a deal that valued it at $8 billion. And if he’s adopting either children or CFOs I’m very available. BC on the way out he cut his stepson a $50 million check, his long time CFO another $40M, bought back his his private jet for a cool $41 million, and threw the deuces. Jersey Mikes is the American dream, sponsored by Private Equity, now available in S1 format.
I have eaten an unreasonable amount of Jersey Mike's. I lived near one in Florida, which was adjacent to a car wash. As someone who worked from home, I'd make it a field trip of sorts on Friday afternoons to reintegrate into society. I’d go get the truck washed, which was my version of retail therapy (my wife's version is much more expensive and does not include banana peppers), and then sit by myself like Stephen Glandsberg, enjoying my Mike’s in silence (like a complete psychopath).
So when a company that I have destroyed tee shirts using their product files to go public at a number people keep whispering is around $12 billion, I read all 291 pages so you don't have to.
TL;DR: Jersey Mike's does not sell you a sandwich. More than 630 franchise owners sell you the sandwich. Jersey Mike's sells them the right to do it, and clips ~11.5% off the top of every register in America.
The filing doesn't hide the ball:
“Jersey Mike's operates a proven, highly-franchised, asset-light business model that generates stable, diversified, and high-margin cash flows.” - S1 Filing
Peel off the sandwich wrapper and this is a royalty business firing on all cylinders.
The only thing I like more than metrics is salted meats. So let’s get into it.
Key Metrics

A quick rundown before we get into the weird stuff. These are the clean numbers, ahead of what Blackstone did to the balance sheet.

System wide sales
Systemwide sales: $4.2 billion, up 13% on top of 12% the year before. This is the “big number” flowing through all the franchisees, not JM’s actual revenue. Every dollar JM earns is a % of this one.
Annual Revenue: $724 million, up 11%. Royalties and other fees were $483 million, plus the marketing fund that franchisees pay into added $203 million (roughly offsetting their own ad opex), plus their handful of company-owned stores which generated $38 million. The royalty line is where all the EBITDA lives.
Net income: $55 million. Thin against $724 million of revenue, but it's a leveraged buyout artifact rather than an actual business problem. The Blackstone section walks it back to what the operating company actually earns. Which is…
Adjusted EBITDA: $339 million, a 47% margin. These are clearly Franchisor royalty economics, not restaurant economics.

Average unit (store) volume growth
Average Unit Volume (AUV): $1.4 million per store, roughly 3x the average U.S. Subway. Also, the worst thing about eating Subway is smelling like Subway the rest of the day.

Same store sales growth
Same-store sales growth: 3.2%. Perhaps worth circling, as it ran hot at 8.4% in 2023, dropped to 2.0% in 2024, wiggled back up to 3.2% in 2025, and is pacing at 2.5% in the first half of 2026. A good chunk of the strong years was menu price, rather than traffic.

Store growth
Net store growth: 8.5%, down from ~12% the prior two years. The filing pins it on a founder-directed development pause in 2024, i.e. the year he was selling the company.
Capex: $11 million against $339 million of EBITDA. Franchisees fund their own store builds, so 97% of Franchisor adjusted EBITDA converts to cash. NICE.
12.5 million loyalty members, 42% of sales digital. You can peep the mix below.

Sales Mix
What you're actually buying

As mentioned before, you’re not buying a sandwich company. You're buying the company that licenses the right to run a sandwich company, and bills for that right in three distinct ways.
A franchise owner signs an Area Development Agreement, which locks up a stretch of the map nobody else can build in, and pays $10,000 for the agreement plus $20,000 every time they open a store inside it. That’s revenue stream #1.
From there, 6.5% of everything that store rings up flows back to corporate as a royalty. It’s a simple rip off the top of every bag of chips and sub sold. That’s revenue stream #2.
And then they earn another 5% into the national ad fund. Think of this as the marketing commitment the individual stores must payback to HQ for services rendered (it’s not cheap to have Danny Devito in your commercials).
Net net, their real royalty rate is closer to 11.5% plus some extra fixed fees.

So where’s the meat?
Sorry, that’s Arby’s.
Two P&Ls, one sandwich

There are two completely different income statements worth talking about. And both of them are tasty.

Let’s start with the operator's. A single store does about $1.4 million in AUV, which is average unit volume, the annual sales that one location rings up at the register. After food, labor, occupancy, and the royalty and ad fund it pays back to corporate, it holds a store-level EBITDA margin around 16%. And it costs roughly $515,000 to build. Important to note - that’s a check the franchisee writes, not Jersey Mike's. The operator funds the buildout, the equipment, and the opening. Corporate funds nada.
If we run the franchise’s return, they make 16% of $1.4 million, or about $224,000 a year, on that $515,000 they spent to open the doors. That's what the pros call “a cash-on-cash return” north of 40%, meaning for every dollar the franchisee put in, they get more than 40 cents back every year in profit.
And that’s why stacking multiple locations is so attractive to operators once they’ve got the playbook down.

The majority of operators run more than one location. And the operators at the top of the system own an average of 60 apiece (the biggest one runs 91).
Jersey Mike’s says north of 90% of its development pipeline is coming from existing franchisees, which is a great flywheel. Said another way, the people who are most successful continue to line up to build out more locations, which end up being better locations because they have precedents to lean on.

Now the corporate P&L, the one you're actually buying a share of in this IPO.
Move over 16% store level profits, Daddy HQ is pulling down a 47% adjusted EBITDA margin. How is that possible on cold cuts? Because corporate skipped the lease, the labor, the roast beef, and the buildout and took its 11.5% off the top instead.
Both sides are making money off the same register, but they have different cost structures. And yet both walk away happy, which is the trick to successful franchising.
The Blackstone math

There’s no axis but this is an area chart crime of mass proportions
The most misleading number in this whole filing is the $55 million of net income, and it's misleading for a super boring reason. Blackstone financed the company to the gills and it purposefully creates a whack of interest payment and non cash expenses.
The first thing I do with a sponsor-owned S1 is hunt down the D&A line, because purchase accounting always leaves a mark (or crater). The accountants (artists?) re-valued what Blackstone bought and wrote it onto the books at fair value, which is how a $5.7 billion trade name lands on an $8.2 billion balance sheet that holds just $13 million of physical assets. The trade name gets amortized, and so does the franchise-agreement intangible sitting next to it. Together they pushed D&A to $96 million in the first year under Blackstone, up from about $10 million the year before. Keep in mind that none of it is cash. But all of it is real on the income statement.
The debt is the other half of the equation. Blackstone dropped $2.1 billion in long term liabilities onto the company through what’s called a whole-business securitization, pledging the brand, the trademarks, the franchise agreements, and the royalty streams into a vehicle and selling notes against them at rates between 2.5% and 5.6%. That registers at $90 million of net interest in year one. And the Financial Times counted roughly $500 million of dividends were paid out of that debt before the S1 ever went public, which tells you what the borrowing was actually for.
So back out both and the real business profitability shows up. Here's the full walk under Blackstone:
Net income: $59 million
Add back net interest: +$90 million
Add back D&A, mostly the new trade name and franchise book: +$96 million
Plain EBITDA: about $247 million
Add back Area Director buyouts ($52M), stock comp ($8M), IPO costs ($7M), corporate transition ($13M)
Adjusted EBITDA: $327 million
When you add the interest and the amortization back, you've bridged a big chunk of the gap between the $59 million and the $327 million. Both of these are derived from the buyout financing structure, and not actually indicative of how Jersey Mike’s sells subs.
The 2% they’re clawing back

Perhaps the smartest move in this filing is the one that makes the current year look worse.
For most of its life, Jersey Mike's didn't sell franchises through corporate. It sold them through Area Directors, or independent operators who bought the development rights to a region and then recruited and supported the franchisees inside it, collecting roughly 2% of gross sales on every store in their territory in return.
Forever.
It's how Cancro grew the system without building a corporate franchising arm, and it meant a slice of the royalty stream was peeled off to middlemen before it ever reached headquarters.
It served its purpose in getting to scale, but now Blackstone appointed CEO Charlie Morrison, of Wingstop fame, is buying that annuity stream back. The company has been paying each Area Director a lump sum to tear up the contract, then pulls the function in-house, and turns a permanent 2% haircut into a one-time cash cost. That shows up as the $52 million labeled “Area Director buyouts” sitting in the adjusted EBITDA add-backs, with more coming as they work through the rest of the territories.
Just know that “non-recurring” is kind of recurring since the buyouts are going to keep landing in the add-backs for years while they consolidate the model.
Potential Red Flags
1. It's an Up-C structure, which means you and Blackstone don't own the same thing.
Jersey Mike's is going public through a structure called an umbrella partnership C-corp. Here's what that means in practice. When you buy the stock, you're buying Class A shares in a holding company that sits on top. That holding company's only real asset is a stake in the business underneath it, where Blackstone and the insiders hold their ownership directly.
Also, Blackstone gets the tax perks of holding the business at the lower level, and gets to convert into your shares on its own schedule, which means you never quite know when a wave of insider stock is about to land on top of you. Generally speaking, when a company hands the public the top-floor shares and keeps the operating company for the sponsor, that's a structure built for the seller's benefit, not the buyer's.

You need 20 years of tax experience + a PHD in calligraphy to make sense of this
2. The company owes its old owners a check for its own tax savings.
As alluded to above, this is called a tax receivable agreement, and it's a cash bill the business agrees to carry.
The short version: the company gets a tax break, then pays about 85% of that break, in cash, back to Blackstone. You and your fellow class of shareholders keep the other 15%.
It's real money leaving the company. And Blackstone doesn’t even have to hold the stock to keep collecting. The exact dollar amount is blank in this draft, so watch for it when the final version drops.
3. This is a controlled company, so the governance guardrails are optional.
Blackstone will hold a majority of the combined voting power after the offering, which lets Jersey Mike's claim the controlled-company exception under NYSE rules. In plain terms, it does not need a majority-independent board, and it can skip independent compensation and nominating committees.
4. There are no dividends coming to you, but the sponsor might take another bite.
The company has no current plans to pay dividends on the Class A stock. Meanwhile the proceeds from this offering go toward repaying the securitization debt and funding a distribution to the pre-IPO owners. And per the Financial Times, roughly $500 million was already dividended out through those securitizations before the S-1 was public.
5. The profit number they want you to use plays games with the charitable donations
The $166 million in charitable donations Jersey Mike's rightly puts on its own cover as a badge of honor gets added back to make the profit line look bigger for the IPO. This giving was done under the previous founder.
The company adds all of it back on the logic that a founder's discretionary generosity won't happen once Blackstone runs the place, which is fair. It also means the founder-era profits are almost useless for comparison, and you're trusting the company on what's truly one-time.

March just became a whole lot more profitable
6. The debt is cheap now but repriced later.
The $2.1 billion sits in a whole-business securitization at blended rates between 2.5% and 5.6%, which looks great (better than my mortgage rate!) until you read the maturity structure.
The notes carry anticipated repayment dates starting in 2029 and legal final maturities out to 2052 and beyond, which means the company is expected to refinance these tranches at whatever rates exist at the end of the decade.
A brand-collateralized bond issued in 2021 at 2.5% probably does not get refinanced at 2.5% in 2029. Just saying.
Valuation
Jersey Mike's hasn't set terms, but the reporting hints the IPO lands somewhere between $10 and $12 billion (and Blackstone paid around $8 billion for the whole thing in early 2025).
Restaurant franchises get valued on a multiple of EBITDA. Jersey Mike's did $339 million of adjusted EBITDA in 2025. Stack the $12 billion equity target on the $1.9 billion of net debt and you're paying about $13.9 billion for the enterprise, which is roughly 41x trailing EBITDA. On next year's estimate it's around 35x.
Here's where the comps sit today:
Domino's: ~18x EBITDA. The mature, 99%-franchised gold standard, same securitized debt structure Jersey Mike's uses.
Wingstop: ~23 to 25x. CEO Charlie Morrison's old shop. Worth noting that number is down hard, because Wingstop's US same-store sales went negative this year and the stock is off about 65% from its peak.
Older franchise buyouts of slower brands (Denny's, Del Taco, Bojangles): 8 to 11x.
So the ask is 41x trailing for a business growing same-store sales in the low single digits, against a peer set where the best growth story in the group trades at 25x while its comps shrink.
To underwrite $12 billion, you have to believe two things happen at once:
unit growth stays high, and
the international bet in Canada and the UK exceed US-level economics.
Canada's early stores are running above the domestic AUV, which is a start, but it's a small base
Blackstone's ~$8 billion from eighteen months ago is probably the floor. My read is the business supports something closer to $9 to $10 billion on the current comps, and $12 billion asks public investors to pay upfront for the international growth before it shows up in the numbers.
Misc. Stuff of Note
They're scared of quantum computing coming for the turkey.
The risk factors run the standard AI hedge… their tools could be incorrectly designed, could leak their IP, could invite lawsuits. Then it keeps going and warns that their systems could someday be undone by quantum computing. This is a company that makes subs by hand, to order, in front of you. Somewhere in the drafting a lawyer made them hedge against a quantum attack on the provolone.
There's a hidden 53rd week in the calendar.
Jersey Mike's runs a 52- or 53-week fiscal year, and every few years a 14th week gets bolted onto Q4. The year it happens, the company picks up an extra week of sales the prior year didn't have, and the annual comp looks stronger for reasons that have nothing to do with more people buying subs. I love seasonality quirks.
No drive-thru is a feature, not a bug.
A Jersey Mike's costs less to build partly because it skips the drive-thru lane a Chick-fil-A or Wendy's pays for. This means cheaper real estate, cheaper buildout, and faster path to a franchisee's return.
The verdict
Great business. The royalty machine is legit, the operators clear a return worth re-upping for, and the store-level margins are the kind you rarely see attached to actual food. However, it’s worth evaluating whether $12 billion is the right price to buy a stake from Blackstone after the investors already piled the debt, pulled some fat dividends, and kept the votes.
Buy the sandwich every Friday. Read the fine print twice before you buy the stock.
None of this is investment advice. I wrote most of it at my kitchen table while Walter sat at my feet waiting for the heel of a #13 that was never coming. Do your own homework.
Wishing you the giant, extra vinegar, and an entry price that leaves something on the table for the rest of us,
CJ

This picnic was a business expense
Weekly Valuation and Efficiency Metrics
Revenue Multiples
Revenue multiples are a shortcut to compare valuations across the technology landscape, where companies may not yet be profitable. The most standard timeframe for revenue multiple comparison is on a “Next Twelve Months” (NTM Revenue) basis.
NTM is a generous cut, as it gives a company “credit” for a full “rolling” future year. It also puts all companies on equal footing, regardless of their fiscal year end and quarterly seasonality.
However, not all technology sectors or monetization strategies receive the same “credit” on their forward revenue, which operators should be aware of when they create comp sets for their own companies. That is why I break them out as separate “indexes”.
Reasons may include:
Recurring mix of revenue
Stickiness of revenue
Average contract size
Cost of revenue delivery
Criticality of solution
Total Addressable Market potential
From a macro perspective, multiples trend higher in low interest environments, and vice versa.
Multiples shown are calculated by taking the Enterprise Value / NTM revenue.
Enterprise Value is calculated as: Market Capitalization + Total Debt - Cash
Market Cap fluctuates with share price day to day, while Total Debt and Cash are taken from the most recent quarterly financial statements available. That’s why we share this report each week - to keep up with changes in the stock market, and to update for quarterly earnings reports when they drop.
Historically, a 10x NTM Revenue multiple has been viewed as a “premium” valuation reserved for the best of the best companies.
Efficiency
Companies that can do more with less tend to earn higher valuations.
Three of the most common and consistently publicly available metrics to measure efficiency include:
CAC Payback Period: How many months does it take to recoup the cost of acquiring a customer?
CAC Payback Period is measured as Sales and Marketing costs divided by Revenue Additions, and adjusted by Gross Margin.
Here’s how I do it:
Sales and Marketing costs are measured on a TTM basis, but lagged by one quarter (so you skip a quarter, then sum the trailing four quarters of costs). This timeframe smooths for seasonality and recognizes the lead time required to generate pipeline.
Revenue is measured as the year-on-year change in the most recent quarter’s sales (so for Q2 of 2024 you’d subtract out Q2 of 2023’s revenue to get the increase), and then multiplied by four to arrive at an annualized revenue increase (e.g., ARR Additions).
Gross margin is taken as a % from the most recent quarter (e.g., 82%) to represent the current cost to serve a customer
Revenue per Employee: On a per head basis, how much in sales does the company generate each year? The rule of thumb is public companies should be doing north of $450k per employee at scale. This is simple division. And I believe it cuts through all the noise - there’s nowhere to hide.
Revenue per Employee is calculated as: (TTM Revenue / Total Current Employees)
Rule of 40: How does a company balance topline growth with bottom line efficiency? It’s the sum of the company’s revenue growth rate and EBITDA Margin. Netting the two should get you above 40 to pass the test.
Rule of 40 is calculated as: TTM Revenue Growth % + TTM Adjusted EBITDA Margin %
A few other notes on efficiency metrics:
Net Dollar Retention is another great measure of efficiency, but many companies have stopped quoting it as an exact number, choosing instead to disclose if it’s above or below a threshold once a year. It’s also uncommon for some types of companies, like marketplaces, to report it at all.
Most public companies don’t report net new ARR, and not all revenue is “recurring”, so I’m doing my best to approximate using changes in reported GAAP revenue. I admit this is a “stricter” view, as it is measuring change in net revenue.
OPEX
Decreasing your OPEX relative to revenue demonstrates Operating Leverage, and leaves more dollars to drop to the bottom line, as companies strive to achieve +25% profitability at scale.
The most common buckets companies put their operating costs into are:
Cost of Goods Sold: Customer Support employees, infrastructure to host your business in the cloud, API tolls, and banking fees if you are a FinTech.
Sales & Marketing: Sales and Marketing employees, advertising spend, demand gen spend, events, conferences, tools.
Research & Development: Product and Engineering employees, development expenses, tools.
General & Administrative: Finance, HR, and IT employees… and everything else. Or as I like to call myself “Strategic Backoffice Overhead.”
All of these are taken on a Gaap basis and therefore INCLUDE stock based comp, a non cash expense.
Companies Included
1. Security & Identity (16 companies) Endpoint, network, IAM, security operations. The CISO budget.
CrowdStrike, Palo Alto Networks, Fortinet, Cloudflare, Zscaler, Okta, SentinelOne, SailPoint, Check Point, Qualys, Tenable, Rapid7, Varonis, Rubrik, Mitek, OneSpan
2. Data & AI Infrastructure (12 companies) Modern data stack, AI/ML platforms, vector and analytics infra, GPU compute. Software-native by design.
Snowflake, Arista Networks, Equinix, CoreWeave, MongoDB, DigitalOcean, Elastic, Akamai, Fastly, Teradata, C3.ai, Cerebras
3. Dev Tools & Observability (10 companies) Anything bought out of the engineering budget.
Datadog, Atlassian, Figma, Dynatrace, Nutanix, GitLab, UiPath, JFrog, AvePoint, PagerDuty
4. Horizontal SaaS & Back Office (18 companies) Software sold across industries to ops, HR, finance, and collaboration teams. Not vertical-specific.
Oracle, ServiceNow, Workday, ADP, Paychex, Paycom, Paylocity, Zoom, DocuSign, Navan, monday.com, Asana, Workiva, BlackLine, RingCentral, 8x8, Box, Dropbox
5. GTM (MarTech & SalesTech) (18 companies) Anything bought out of the revenue org. Marketing automation, sales engagement, CRM, ad tech, customer experience.
Salesforce, Adobe, HubSpot, The Trade Desk, Twilio, Klaviyo, Braze, ZoomInfo, Freshworks, Amplitude, Semrush, Five9, Zeta Global, Wix, Sprout Social, ON24, Yext, Criteo
6. Vertical SaaS (15 companies) Software built for a specific industry without take-rate or transaction economics.
Palantir, Autodesk, Veeva, Samsara, ServiceTitan, Guidewire, Tyler Technologies, Doximity, Procore, AppFolio, CCC Intelligent Solutions, Blackbaud, nCino, CareCloud, CS Disco
7. Take-Rate Platforms (18 companies) Marketplaces and commerce platforms that earn money on transaction volume.
Uber, Airbnb, Shopify, MercadoLibre, DoorDash, eBay, Zillow, CarGurus, Instacart, Etsy, Toast, Lyft, Opendoor, StubHub, Upwork, Coursera, Ethos, Fiverr
8. Payments & Money Movement (10 companies) The rails. Payment processors, payment infrastructure, B2B payments, treasury. Volume game, utility margins.
Intuit, Fiserv, Adyen, PayPal, Block, Shift4, BILL, Flywire, Marqeta, Lightspeed
9. Consumer Fintech, Lending & Crypto (15 companies) The front-end. Consumer-facing financial apps, BNPL, lending platforms, crypto exchanges. CAC-driven, marketing-heavy, totally different unit economics from #8.
Coinbase, Robinhood, SoFi, Chime, Affirm, Upstart, Circle, Bullish, Figure, Klarna, Sezzle, Gemini, Blend, Remitly, LendingClub
Please check out our data partner, Koyfin. It’s dope.
Wishing you trade at a high revenue and EBITDA multiple,
CJ














