The End of an Era
5/5/24 Benchmarks for Operators
The first thing I did when I became CFO was manually map out EVERY way in which cash entered and left the building. The buck stopped with me. And I felt the pain. On that note...
A quick word from our sponsor Ledge
Is your team struggling with manual transaction matching & cash reporting?
Meet Ledge, a finance operations platform that automates cash reconciliation and journal entry creation, centralizes exception management, and provides real-time cash flow analysis and forecasting. Ledge glues together all your financial data spread across your ERP, banks, payment processors, data warehouses, and more with no R&D or IT required.
With Ledge, growing your revenue doesn’t need to mean growing your team. Increase controls, accuracy, and your ability to steer the business in real-time, without needing to scale headcount.
TL;DR: Multiples are trending slightly DOWN week-over-week.
Top 10 Medians:
EV / NTM Revenue = 14.8x
CAC Payback = 23 months
Rule of 40 = 52%
Revenue per Employee = $380K
Closing the Gap
We’ve reached a critical inflection point.
The median FCF margin companies are forecasting for the next 12 months has officially eclipsed Revenue Growth estimated over the same period. If you look at the Blue profitability line below, it now matches (and slightly surpasses) the Green revenue growth line (chart courtesy of our friends at Meritech).
This means that the median public tech company is now forecasting a (slightly) better bottom line than top line in comparative percentage terms over the next year.
For more than 16 quarters we observed a broad delta between the two measures. Growth lived well above 20%, funded by profitability that lived far below the surface. And now that gap is closed.
At this point in time the market values them both evenly, and there’s momentum in the direction of profits. It would also imply that the median Rule of 40% is somewhere in the ballpark of 28%.
I’d mark this as the official end of an era. “Growth at all costs” is dead; long live “Growth at all costs”. And I couldn’t be happier - I’ve gotten so damn sick of hearing people vaguely parrot that same packet of words to describe anything related to a P&L. Please join me in sending it off into the sunset! Enjoy your retirement.
Figures for each index are measured at the Median unless otherwise stated
Average, Median, and Top 10 Median are measured across the entire data set, where n = 116
All margins are non-gaap
You can find the list of companies within each sector here.
All definitions and formulas can be found here.
If you’d like the specific company level performance benchmarks used in these reports visit Virtua Research.
Revenue Multiples
Revenue multiples are a shortcut to compare valuations across the technology landscape, where companies may not yet be profitable. The most standard timeframe for revenue multiple comparison is on a “Next Twelve Months” (NTM Revenue) basis.
NTM is a generous cut, as it gives a company “credit” for a full “rolling” future year. It also puts all companies on equal footing, regardless of their fiscal year end and quarterly seasonality.
However, not all technology sectors or monetization strategies receive the same “credit” on their forward revenue, which operators should be aware of when they create comp sets for their own companies. That is why I break them out as separate “indexes”.
Reasons may include:
Recurring mix of revenue
Stickiness of revenue
Average contract size
Cost of revenue delivery
Criticality of solution
Total Addressable Market potential
From a macro perspective, multiples trend higher in low interest environments, and vice versa.
Multiples shown are calculated by taking the Enterprise Value / NTM revenue.
Enterprise Value is calculated as: Market Capitalization + Total Debt - Cash
Market Cap fluctuates with share price day to day, while Total Debt and Cash are taken from the most recent quarterly financial statements available. That’s why we share this report each week - to keep up with changes in the stock market, and to update for quarterly earnings reports when they drop.
Historically, a 10x NTM Revenue multiple has been viewed as a “premium” valuation reserved for the best of the best companies.
Efficiency Benchmarks
Companies that can do more with less tend to earn higher valuations.
Three of the most common, and consistently publicly available, metrics to measure efficiency include:
CAC Payback Period: How many months does it take to recoup the cost of acquiring a customer?
CAC Ratio is calculated as: (∆TTM Sales * Gross Profit Margin) / TTM S&M
CAC Payback Period is calculated as: (1 / CAC ratio) * 12
Note: Some may measure CAC Payback using the change in last quarter’s revenue x 4, but I believe this overstates a company’s progress if they are growing fast, and the output can be volatile due to quarterly sales seasonality. That’s why I look at it on a Trailing Twelve Month Basis.
Rule of 40: How does a company balance topline growth with bottom line efficiency? It’s the sum of the company’s revenue growth rate and free cash flow margin. Netting the two should get you above 40 to pass the test.
Rule of 40 is calculated as: Total Revenue Growth YoY % + Non Gaap Operating Profit Margin %
Non Gaap Free Cash Flow is calculated as: Net cash provided by operating activities, minus capital expenditures and minus capitalized software development costs.
Revenue per Employee: On a per head basis, how much in sales does the company generate each year? The rule of thumb is public companies should be doing north of $450k per employee at scale. This is simple division. And I believe it cuts through all the noise - there’s nowhere to hide.
Revenue per Employee is calculated as: (TTM Revenue / Total Current Employees)
A few other notes on efficiency metrics:
Net Dollar Retention is another great measure of efficiency, but many companies have stopped quoting it as an exact number, choosing instead to disclose if it’s above or below a threshold once a year. It’s also uncommon for marketplaces and fintechs to report it at all.
Most public companies don’t report net new ARR, and not all revenue is “recurring”, so I’m using annual change in TTM revenue timeframes as a proxy in my calculations. I admit this is a “stricter” view, as it is measuring change in net revenue, rather than gross revenue additions pre-churn.
Operating Expenditures
Decreasing your OPEX relative to revenue demonstrates Operating Leverage, and leaves more dollars to drop to the bottom line, as companies strive to achieve +25% profitability at scale.
The three most common buckets companies put their operating costs into are:
Sales & Marketing: Sales and Marketing employees, advertising, demand gen, events, conferences, tools
Research & Development: Product and Engineering employees, development expenses, tools
General & Administrative: Finance, HR, and IT employees… and everything else. Or as I like to call myself “Strategic Backoffice Overhead”
All of these are taken on a non Gaap basis and therefore exclude stock based comp, a non cash expense. SBC is still an important figure to track for total comp and dilution purposes, though.
All benchmarking data provided by Virtua Research.
For assistance with your own benchmarking and equity research needs, contact cventi@virtuaresearch.com.
Tell him CJ sent you; he'll hook you up!"
Love your column. Thank you. I missed the analysis which states that growth and margin are now valued equally - perhaps I am being slow or have misread!